621.LIFECYCLE COSTS COMPARATION BETWEEN DISTRICT HEATING AND INDIVIDUAL GAS HEATING

Authors

  • Dimitrovski Dame Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, "Ss. Cyril and Methodius" University in Skopje, Karpoš II bb, P.O. box 464, 1001 Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
  • Stojevski Dalibor Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, "Ss. Cyril and Methodius" University in Skopje, Karpoš II bb, P.O. box 464, 1001 Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55302/MESJ19371-2621087d

Keywords:

district heating, gas heating, air pollution, heating costs

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to define the economically more feasible solution to the air pollution problem in Skopje through use of district heating (DH) or individual gas heating. Suburb model is Lisiče in Skopje. Analyzed are the total lifecycle costs of entire city quarter through use of the mentioned heating types. The energy consumption and CO2 emissions from different lifecycle phases depend on the properties of pipe material, type of technologies used (during manufacturing the pipe, installing equipment and pumping technologies) and the type of fluid. Four phases are considered in this lifecycle assessment, which are production and fabrication, transportation to job site, pipe installation and operation or service phase. As can be concluded, total lifecycle costs in DH system are lower than the costs for individual gas heating. The slightly higher operating costs are annulled by the costs for maintenance and CO2, which are significantly larger by use of individual gas heating system. By use of DH system in the suburb of Lisiče, the emission of PM10/2,5 will be practically extinguished as the DH system uses natural gas as only source. This will lead to improved air quality in this part of Skopje.

References

European Environment Agency: Air Quality in Europe, 23(2015).

Tashevski, D., Filkovski, R., Armenski, S., Dimitrovski, D., Shesho, I.: Defining techno-economic optimal and ecologic sustainable heat structure of Skopje, 59 (2017).

Dimitrovski, D.: UNDP Support: Analysis of household heating practices in Skopje Valley, 2017.

Or, G., Lelyveld, T., Burton, S.: Final Report: In-situ monitoring of efficiencies of condensing boilers and use of secondary heating, Prepared by: GASTEC at CRE LtdAECOM EA Technology, Prepared for: The Energy Saving Trust, Contract Number: GaC3563, June 2009.

Energy Regulatory Agency of Macedonia: Decision for heat price for supply Heat Balkan Energy, 2018.

Energy Regulatory Agency of Macedonia: Decision for gas transmission tariff for GA-MA, 2019.

Energy Regulatory Agency of Macedonia: Decision for gas distribution tariff for Kumanovo Gas, 2019.

Khan, L. R., Tee, K. F.: Quantification and comparison of carbon emissions for flexible underground pipelines, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 42 (10), pp. 728–736 (2015).

Downloads

Published

12-06-2020